الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Positron emission tomography (PET) and CT are diagnostic modalities usually combined in a PET/CT examination using 18F-flouro-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG). 18F-FDG-PET provides information about cellular metabolism, and CT visualizes morphological details of organs and tissues. 18F-FDG is used as a marker of glucose metabolism (wong et al., 2011), and areas of increased uptake are suspect for malignancy, especially if correlated with morphological CT changes. Non-malignant disorders like infection and inflammation may also show abnormal 18FFDG accumulation, and physiological uptake mimicking pathological accumulation can occur leading to PET misinterpretation. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is valuable in the detection, staging and control of malignant diseases and is also sensitive for detection of incidental clinically relevant foci. Thus, in a study evaluating infections and inflammations by 18F-FDG-PET/CT, malignancy was detected in 6 of 26 patients (23.1%). The malignancies had not been detected by CT and Xray performed before the PET/CT. Incidental abnormalities on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography PET/CT have been reported in 6.71-12.2 % of scans. Accurate interpretation of incidental focal uptake and knowing when to suggest further investigations therefore requires knowledge of its differential diagnosis, the incidence of malignancy and any PET/CT criteria which can be used to further characterize it. As PET/CT imaging becomes more widely available, reporting radiologists are encountering a large number of incidental findings. The emphasis the reporter places on an incidental findings will influence further management, as does the stage of the primary cancer and the patient‟s comorbidity. Many clinicians are uncertain of the relevance of the reported unexpected findings and require guidance relating to their importance and the need for further investigation. All malignancies should be discussed at local site-specific multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs). Increasingly, a PET/CT-trained radiologist and provide advice on the probable significance of such findings in conjunction with the clinical context. Some parameters are used as diagnostic criteria for 18F-FDG PET/CT to increase the accuracy of detecting malignancy. The most typical diagnostic criterion parameter is the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). However, SUVmax has limitations, because it is also increased in benign conditions related to physiologic variations, degeneration, and infection or inflammation, as well as in malignant lesions. One of the methods to overcome this problem is to use dual-time point PET imaging in the identification of malignant lesions. Various studies have reported the effectiveness of dual-time point PET imaging in different malignancies. They suggested the retention index (RI), the percentage change between the 1-h SUVmax and the 2-h SUVmax, as a diagnostic criterion. |