Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
اثر جائحة كورونا علي التزامات الاطراف بعقد مقاولة الانشاء في التشريع المصري والتشريع الكويتي /
المؤلف
الفعر، فواز سند فالح سند حجاب.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / فواز سند فالح سند حجاب الفعر
مشرف / حسام الدين محمود حسن
مناقش / مني ابوبكر الصديق محمد
مناقش / مني ابوبكر الصديق محمد
الموضوع
الكرونا.
تاريخ النشر
2024.
عدد الصفحات
336 ص. :
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
قانون
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2024
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنصورة - كلية الحقوق - قسم القانون المدني
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 336

from 336

المستخلص

The Impact of the Corona Pandemic on the Obligations of the Parties to the Construction Contract in Egyptian and Kuwaiti Legislation Extract The contract is a feat and a giant system of law, it is the law itself, and the most important systems under it. The contract plays the most fundamental role in the world of money among people, and it is the most common system of law in their live. The contracting contract is one of the most prominent in the contemporary world, especially in the field of construction at the domestic and international levels. Thus, the contracting contract has become one of the most widely known s situation and conflicts - and its ever-evolving situations of creation complex, often, given the important place it enjoys in legal regulations - most Arab and foreign legislation provided it with special texts, which made it independent of the rest of the contracts that it had merged such as the employment contract and the lease contract. The pandemic in general - and the coronavirus pandemic in particular - are among the main causes affecting contractual commitments. Which shows an impact on the principle of The contract is the law of contracting parties. as one of the established principles of jurisprudence and law and compatible with the values of justice, otherwise what is the value of contracts if their parties are not bound? However, the binding force accorded by this rule to the contract is not absolute. In granting it binding force, justice permits exceptions, but the exceptions need to be clear in order not to become the original, leaving out the former rule’s content. In such cases, the creditor clings to the binding force of the contract and maintains the debtor’s claim for full performance of its obligations, ignoring the changing circumstances, the debtor’s loss, if compelled to perform, and the debtor tries to uphold his circumstances, as it renders it impossible to fulfil an almost compelling impossibility in which the obligation expires.