الفهرس 
الفصل التمهيدي: ميليتوس دراسة جغرافية تاريخيةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 307 |  |  |
| | | from | 307 | | |
المستخلص
أن هدف الدراسة إظهار الدور السياسي الاقتصادي التي قامت بها مدينة ميليتوس سواء في الفترة الليدية والفارسية الأثينية والمقدونية الهيللينستية (السليوقية–البطلمية والرومانية).
قسمت الدراسة إلى خمس فصول بداية من الفصل التمهيدي بعنوان ميليتوس دراسة جغرافية تاريخية في هذه الحقبة تناول الباحث أثر الموقع على ميليتوس وتاريخها السياسي والاقتصادي من خلال النقاط الآتية موقع ميليتوس وأثر الطبيعة على ميليتوس وإسهامات مدينة ميليتوس في الحضارة اليونانية سواء الاقتصادية بإنشاء المستوطنات وإبراز دور الآلهة في ميليتوس والأهمية الثقافية بإنشاء المدارس لتعليم الأطفال وتم تناول مشكلة الشعب الأصلي لمدينة ميليتوس وتناول الأدلة وإثبات أن ميليتوسأثينية.
أما عن الفصل الأول الذي يحمل عنوان الاستيطان الميليتي وعلاقة ميليتوس بالدولة الليدية (630-546 ق. م)، تم تناول ظاهرة الاستيطان الميليتي ودوافعه ومستعمراته ونتائجه وعلاقة ميليتوس بالدولة الليدية في عهد ملوكها بداية من جيجس حتى كرويسوس.
أما الفصل الثاني المعنون: مدينة ميليتوس تحت النفوذ الفارسي 546/479ق.م طرح الباحث في هذه الحقبة دور ميليتوس في الفترة الفارسية من خلال كيفية سقوط المدن الأيونية في قبضة الفرس ووضع أهل ميليتوس تحت السيطرة الفارسية وظهور ميليتوس كقائد لثورة الأيونية متمثلة في أرستاجوراسالميليتي وذهابه إلى بلاد اليونان لتأجيج نار الثورة الأيونية وظهور دور بلاد اليونان (أثينا) في الثورة الأيونية وتم سرد الأحداث الرئيسية وسقوط ميليتوس على يد الفرس وإعادة بناء ميليتوس على يد هيبوداموسالميليتي.
والفصل الثالث مدينة ميليتوس اثناء السيطرة الاثينية والحروب البلوبونيزية (479– 404 ق.م) تناول الباحث في هذا الفصل علاقة ميليتوس ببلاد اليونان متمثلة في أثينا وتم إيضاح علاقة ميليتوس بالقوة الأثينية وانضمام ميليتوس لحلف ديلوس، ثم محاولة ميليتوس بالتمرد والثورة على السيطرة الأثينية بالقيام بالثوريين ضد الهيمنة الأثينية مما اضطر الجانب الأثيني إلى فرض عقوبات وقوانين تحجم الثورة الميليتية، وظهر أيضا الدور السياسي لميليتوس في الحروب البلوبونيزية من خلال محاولة أطراف عديدة لاستغلال موقع ميليتوس في هذه الحروب سواء أثينا أو أسبرطة والصراع بينها لمحاولة السيطرة على ميليتوس ودخول جانب أخر وهم الفرس.
والفصل الرابع: مدينة ميليتوس في زمن الاسكندر الأكبر 336 ق . م – 323 ق.م . في هذا الفصل قام الباحث بإظهار شخصية الاسكندر الأكبر العالمية بإخضاعه لبلاد اليونان وسيره إلى الإمبراطورية الفارسية والسيطرة عليها وتبعا لذلك خضوع المدن التابعة للإمبراطورية الفارسية له ومنها مدينة ميليتوس وكان ذلك عن طريق معركة جرانيكوس وظهر من خلال محاولة سيطرة الاسكندر الأكبر على ميليتوس المقاومة الضارية التي تمتع بها الجانب الميليتي وفي النهاية تم السيطرة على ميليتوس من قبل الاسكندر الأكبر.
أما عن الفصل الخامس المعنون مدينة ميليتوس في الفترة الهيللينستية 323 ق.م - 189 ق.م.
تناول الباحث في هذه النقطة تأثير الموقع على ميليتوس ونواتج ذلك في محاولة الممالك الهيللنيستينة بالسيطرة على ميليتوس بعد وقوع الاسكندر الأكبر بداية من السيطرة البطلمية على ميليتوس والوجود السلوقي في ميليتوس وعلاقات ممتدة بين الطرفين وحملة فيليب الخامس على ميليتوس ثم السيطرة الرومانية على ميليتوس بمعاهدة أباميا عام 188 ق.م، وشرح الباحث النظام السياسي في ميليتوس بداية من الحكام والقضاة والمجالس التشريعية والوظائف الملكية والمدنية والعسكرية. وقام الباحث بعرض تبرعات الأسرة الحاكمة ومساعدتها في ميليتوس.
الكلمات المفتاحية: دور ميليتوس في الفترة (الليدية- الفارسية- الأثينية المقدونية - الهيللينسية).
Research topic: The political and economic role of the city of Miletus from the Greek era until the beginning of Roman control (800-189 BC), an analytical historical study through literary sources.
In this study, the researcher dealt with the economic and political role of the city of Miletus through the different eras, including Preparatory, Lydian, Persian, Athenian, Macedonian, and Hellenistic.
At the beginning, the researcher dealt with the preamble entitled Miletus, a historical geographic study in the distinguished location of Miletus throughout its history, as it was the reason for the recurrence of the external invasion to take advantage of its economic resources for the Lydian and Persian side.–Athenian–Macedonian–Ptolemaic–Seleucid–roman)
And the contributions of the city of Miletus to Greek civilization, whether cultural–Religious, political and economic, the researcher addressed the issue of the origin of the Miletian people through ancient historians such as Homer and Herodotus Pausanias, as well as archaeological aspects and archaeological evidence. Therefore, in presenting the problem, we saw the difference in the origins of the city, whether it was Carian or Cretan.–Hittite and Athenian, and in the end the city of Miletus, Athens in origin, appeared with a presentation of the Ionian migration to Miletus and mentioning multiple elements involved in the Ionian migration.
As for the first chapter entitled Miletus settlement and the relationship of Miletus with the Lydian state–63-546 BC.
In this chapter, the researcher discussed the following points: Firstly, the Miletus settlement as a phenomenon, its motives, the Miletus colonies, with the link to the Greek settlement, knowledge of the economic, political and social results of the settlement, and knowledge of the Miletus colonies on the Black Sea and the Sea of Marmara. Among the most important colonies are Heptastadium, Abydos, Kolonai, Babsos, Lampsakos, Sinope, Amisos, and Myos.
In the northern Black Sea, Miletus founded many settlements, including the current settlement of Olbia Odessa. It also established the settlement of Masis in the eastern Black Sea and Trabizond in the southern Black Sea, and entered Megara as a competitor.
So Heraclea resided in the Harsonis (Crimea). Astros, Olympia, Panticapaeum, and a number of other colonies were inhabited, and we could not cultivate anything there except after obtaining permission and expressing good faith towards those controlling the sea entrances, such as Megara. After that, the researcher discussed Miletus’ relationship with the Lydian state. And how the Lydian state controlled the Ayyubid cities, including the city of Miletus. Secondly, the relationship of the kings of the Lydian state to the Miletian power.–where this relationship was characterized by utilitarianism and benefiting from the bounties of Miletus and the struggle of Miletus with the kings of the Lydian state, beginning with the Lydian king Gyges, his policy towards Miletus, then the Miletian role comes in front of the Lydian danger through the confrontation by the Miletian ruler Thrasybulus, and multiple wars took place between the Milenic side and the Lydian side, and it was one of the most important attempts Lydia under the control and hegemony of Lydian Croesus, who was able to level most of the Ionian cities.
And third: the war of the Elantine Plain and the different cities participating in it, including the city of Miletus–We can distinguish between two groups of cities that include the first group of the cities of Sassos, Corinth, Sparta, Artrai, Paros, Andros, and Athens, while the other group includes Miletus, Chios, Megara, Argos, and Aegina, and each group always appears in our historical sources in a state of hostility with the other group.
The Eleantine War was essentially a war between Chalcis and Eritrea for the Elephantine Plain, while the allies of each side were busy fighting each other. Strangely enough, it was a chapter in a larger conflict. Although Chalcis won the disputed plain, that did not have the slightest impact on the course of the war in the Peloponnese. The opposing party, represented by Phaedo, the ruler of Argos, achieved victory. The Lilantean war was not in the favor of Ayopia, and Eritrea lost its old fortified points located near Cumae, which fell into the hands of Chalcis. What is surprising is that this war affected a large part of the Greek world.
Chapter Two: In this chapter, the researcher deals with the Persian relationship through the following points: the fall of the Ionian cities with the fall of Leda, and accordingly the fall of the Ionian cities and the fall of Miletus, and the situation of Miletus during the Persian hegemony and rule through rulers between the Persian Empire and they were tyrants until the ruling regime in Miletus changed with the occurrence of the Ionian Revolution. .
The researcher narrated the Ionian Revolution, starting from its motives until the fall of Miletus at the hands of the Persians. The causes of the Ionian Revolution were diverse, the diversity of the individuals and the participating cities, and he analyzed the motives of this revolution on several levels, including that he understood the words of Herodotus that the strength of feeling hostile to tyrannical tyrants was an important factor in igniting the revolution and injustices. Regarding the freedom that the Asian Greeks had to demand from the Persians, and that the clash between the Greeks who wanted independence and the Persian Empire seeking expansion was inevitable, or that the king failed to abolish the idea of independence among the Greeks of Greece in Asia Minor, and that some tried to look at the Ionian Revolution as A reaction to the economic crisis that struck Asia Minor at the end of the sixth century BC.
As for the political role of Miletus, represented by Aristagoras of Miletus and his conflict with Histiaeus and his rise to power and his exploitation of the people of Naxos in a campaign on the island of Naxos and the failure of the campaign, he took the failure of the campaign as an excuse to carry out a revolution against the Persians and go to Greece, especially the city of Athens and Sparta, and Athens agreed to help and provide a helping hand to the Greeks. The Asians in Miletus and Sparta rejected this matter, and Aristagoras broadcast propaganda policy for revolution throughout Asia.
As for the main events of the revolution, they were the Persians attacking the Ionian cities, including Miletus, after the Asian Greeks burned the Persian Sardis. The events included the Battle of Marsia and La Baronda, the Battle of Bidasus. The end of the true leaders of the revolution actually ended, and Miletus was completely destroyed to the ground, but it was rebuilt by the Miletus builder Hippodamus. As it was in the past.
As for the third chapter, entitled The City of Miletus during Athenian control and the Peloponnesian Wars 479-404 BC. M.
In this time period, the extended relations between the Miletian side and the Athenians appeared, whether politically or socially, and this was through the presence of some Miletian elements in Athens, assuming some important positions, and obtaining many privileges from Athens.
But in Miletus, the true revolutionary face appeared in the face of Athenian hegemony, with many revolts on the part of Miletus after entering behind Delos, and Athens was forced to respond strongly to this revolution by placing strict laws on the Miletus side and imposing military garrisons in Miletus and Athenian judges for trial.
But what is noticeable and important in this aspect is the length of the revolution or two revolutions that Miletus carried out against the Athenian side, and it is clear from the inscriptions that Athens was interested in the Miletus revolution and imposed taxes and tried the individuals who carried out the revolution, and the matter reached exile and confiscation of funds, and in the end Athens was able to freeze this Miletus revolution. They are usually taxed back to the Delos Pact.
As for the role of Miletus in the Peloponnesian Wars, it was one of the most important roles, as the two parties participating in the (Peloponnesian) war tried to exploit the unique position of Miletus and each party tried to control, dominate, and obtain Miletus.
Miletus had an effective and influential role in the Peloponnesian Wars, whether by providing Miletus soldiers, and when the Peloponnesian War broke out in Athens and Sparta, the people of Miletus sent fighters to help the Athenians in their military campaigns against the cities of Corinth and Kerkyra.
The people of Sparta took advantage of the location of Miletus and made it a naval base for the Spartan leaders and Miletus economic resources, and the return of Persian control over Miletus.
As for the fourth chapter, which talks about the Macedonian period, Alexander the Great was able to unite Greece by eliminating the revolutions of Greek cities such as Thebes and imposing calm and stability within Greece with an attempt and starting from this point. For his father’s death.
This is what happened in the fall of 335 BC. A.D. until Alexander, the son of twenty-one years old, had subdued most of the Greek countries with one blow and wrested for himself the leadership of the Greek and Macedonian forces and became an uncompetitive leader by imposing his authority on a vast area extending from the Ployons in the south until the Danube in the north and from Kerkara Island in the west to the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles in the east and returned to Macedonia As a hero worthy of admiration, the Greeks changed their view of God, and they felt that a new star had risen in the sky of glory, and it was good for them to be with him, not against him.
In the battle of Granicus, Alexander the Great was able to control Miletus. As a result of this battle, Sardis surrendered without a fight, and this was followed by the pledge of allegiance to the Ionian cities to Alexander. That they pledged allegiance to him, and Alexander did not leave the coast of Asia Minor until he was assured that the Persian fleet would not be able to return to him, as he was aware that the battle between him and Darius had not yet begun.
Alexander the Great succeeded in seizing Miletus by any means of surrender or siege, so in the end he seized Miletus. The Greek historian Strabo mentioned that Miletus was unlucky, as it closed its doors in the face of Alexander and was seized by force. Alexander’s position was different, as happened with the city of Miletus. He heard that some of its defenders from the people of Miletus wanted to join his army.
In any case, Alexander succeeded in conquering Miletus and securing it for possessions, and before continuing his advance beyond Asia Minor, he established temporary administrative, financial, and military systems within his policy that he had drawn up for this country. Faced with the lack of time, Alexander retained most of the Persian administrative systems, while saving some real changes and modifications. In the provinces that he conquered in Asia was satisfied with establishing independent financial supervisors, leaving the Macedonian governors to appoint them instead of the Persian governors, combining civil authority and military authority. Perhaps the reason for Alexander the Great’s use of these Persian systems in a temporary manner was his preoccupation with completing his conquests in the East.
As for the Hellenistic period, the kingdoms fought against Miletus starting with the Ptolemaic Kingdom and the emergence of relations between the Ptolemaic and Miletus sides, and the relationship began from Ptolemy I until Ptolemy V.
As well as the Seleucid side, which sent a letter carrying extended relations between the Seleucid side and the Miletian side, it is clear from the letter some terms that express the relationship between the two parties, such as care, concern, and sending gifts, such as the statue of Apollo, and paying Seleucid citizenship to some Milne citizens.
And also the Roman side, which was able to control the Militian side in the Treaty of Apamea in 188 BC. AD after the victory over the Seleucid side in the Battle of Magnesia in 189 BC. AD The Romans showed great interest in the architectural aspects of the city of Miletus, including theaters and the construction of canals, and in the end Miletus was annexed to the Roman state of Asia.