الفهرس 
Introduction and aim of the workOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 117 |  |  |
| | | from | 117 | | |
Abstract
The use of regenerative endodontic therapy as an effective therapeutic alternative to traditional root canal treatment for non-vital adult permanent teeth with or without apical periodontitis is likely to be authorised.
Objectives The purpose of this randomised controlled clinical experiment was to examine the clinical and radiographic success of a regeneration surgery employing a blood clot scaffold in non-vital mature permanent teeth with and without photobiomodulation therapy during a 12-month follow-up period. Further, an ex-vivo investigation was carried out to identify and assess the histological features of regenerated tissues in canine adult teeth.
In the in-vivo randomised clinical trial portion, 24 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups (control or study), with each group receiving treatment according to a standardised revascularization treatment regimen that used a blood clot scaffold. Clinical and radiological outcomes were tracked for a full year in both groups. They were radiographically evaluated for periapical tissue state and apical dentine thickness using standardised digital radiographs, and clinically evaluated for the presence or absence of swelling, and sinus tract, mobility test using the two mirror handles, and sensibility test using cold sensibility test and electric pulp test.
Fifty-four premolar roots with full development were studied experimentally outside of living organisms. group I (positive control group) had regeneration treatments using a blood clot as a scaffold, group II (research group) was treated with the same regenerative protocol as group I, but also underwent photobiomodulation therapy, and group III (negative control group) received no treatment. Each group was then subdivided into a 3-week, 10-week, and 15-week subgroup, with a total of 18 people in each subgroup.
Following euthanasia, the jaws were dissected, and teeth and supporting components were extracted and preserved in 4% paraformaldehyde before being decalcified in 10% EDTA. A sample was collected from each root to conduct a histologic analysis. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections were evaluated for inflammation, fibroblast and endothelial cell numbers, and the proportion of tissue covered by blood vessels at various times. After that, R statistical analysis software, version 4.1.3 for Windows, was used to conduct the statistical analysis of the acquired data.
What we found out from this investigation is that
Article 1 (in-vivo part)
from the beginning to the conclusion of the follow-up periods, no recurrence or pathological sign alterations were observed in the clinical examination of pain, swelling, and the sinus tract in any of the patients.
Normal physiologic mobility was found in a pre- and post-REPs clinical examination of all patients.
3. Thirty percent of patients in the study group reacted favourably to the cold sensitivity test at the 9-month follow-up, whereas all cases in the control group evoked a negative reaction. Sixty percent of patients in both groups passed the cold test at the conclusion of the follow-up period.
The electric pulp sensitivity test was positive for 20% of patients in the study group at 9 months of follow-up, whereas it was negative for all cases in the control group. Approximately half of patients in each group showed positive results on the electric pulp sensitivity test at the conclusion of the follow-up period.
The average thickness of the root dentine increased in both groups, with significant differences between the two groups (P0.001) but no differences between the groups overall (P=1).
However, it should be emphasised that the periapical tissue healing began sooner in the study group, even though there was no statistically significant difference in the result between the two groups at any of the intervals tested. Positive results were seen in both groups, with all periapical lesions healing.
Part 2 (Outside the Body):
One, the mean area percentage of blood vessels was higher in the study group than in the positive control group, with both groups’ results being equivalent to the negative control group. This difference was statistically significant (P 0.001).
Two, when comparing the study group to the positive control group and the negative control group, the study group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mean endothelial cell number (P 0.001).
Three, when comparing the study group to the positive control group and the negative control group, the study group revealed a statistically significant increase in the mean number of fibroblasts (P value=0.047).
4. There was a statistically significant difference (P0.001) between the groups when looking at the level of inflammation, with the vast majority of patients exhibiting a low level of inflammation.