الفهرس 
مقدمة منهجيةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 305 |  |  |
| | | from | 305 | | |
المستخلص
Goal & importance
The current study aimed to form a real structure for social & economic factors that may play an important role in disease, in order to use this knowledge as a social dimension for treatment & asserting the importance the importance of social aspects in treatment.
The importance of this study is a following:-
- putting the socioeconomic factors in priority when treating diseases, due to its important influence in the success or failure of the treatment plan.
- Demonstrating the contributions of sociology and its convenience for researching diseases, prophylaxis & management, using the issues of medical sociology to study the disease as a social status and using hypothesis to provide different explanations.
- Applying medical sociology data in the regard of socioeconomic factors role in disease, as an attempt to develop this framework through the comprehensive understanding of these factors.
- Measuring individual perception to the role played by socioeconomic factors in disease.
Study problems & hypothesis that the study endeavored to verify.
The study problem was studying the social factors (Ecology, sociology & physical ecology) and the economic factors (social class) regarding disease.
The main hypothesis
- there is a statistically significant relation (0.05) between socioeconomic factors & disease.
The first branch hypothesis: there is a statistically significant relation (0.05) between the social, factors (social ecology, physical ecology) and disease.
The second branch hypothesis: there is a statistically significant relation (0.05) between the economic factors (social class) and disease.
Study scopes:
A – The place reach:
1- Patients place – Tripoli medical center.
2- Healthy people place – various and different places in Tripoli.
B- individuals reach:
1- A group of male & female patients in the admission wards in Tripoli Medical center.
2- A group of healthy people form different places in Tripoli.
C- Time frame:
- Starting as from registration date 02-10-2012 until preparing the final form of the thesis on February 2015.
Study tools:
Questionnaire forms to monitor the index of socioeconomic factors.
Study results:
1. there is statistically significant effect for the socioeconomic factors on disease (0.05), and that means the patient are surrounded by negative socioeconomic factors than the healthy people.
2. there is a statistically significant effect for the social factors on disease (0.05), and that means the patient are surrounded by negative social factors more than the healthy people.
a- there is a statistically significant effect for the social ecology (social habits – family relations) on disease (0.05)/
b- there is a statistically significant effect for the materialistic ecology (neighborhood- residence) on disease (0.05).
3. there is a statistically significant effect for the economic factors (social class) on disease (0.05).
4. Meaning the there is a statistically significant effect for social class (income – Education – profession) on disease (0.05).